Sie lesen aktuell unserer Archiv. Die aktuelle Webseite befindet sich unter: iep-berlin.de
You are currently reading our archive. The current webseite is located at: iep-berlin.de/en/

integration 4/2012

Our current issue draws attention to the reality of differ­en­tiated integration in the area of freedom, security and justice. Further, it discusses the successful coordi­nation of the Danish EU Presi­dency in turbulent times. Another article deals with the evolvement and devel­opment of the EEAS and the organ­i­sation of the European foreign and devel­opment aid. Other topics include the subna­tional admin­is­tra­tions as guarantors of legit­imacy in the EU. A review focuses on the Treaty of Lisbon and the ‘new‘ EU. The AEI reports on three confer­ences about European sport politics, about the role of social media and about renewable energy.


Opt-Outs, Opt-Ins, Opt-Arounds? Structuring the Differentiated Integration Reality within the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice

Funda Tekin

These days differ­en­tiated integration forms a highly topical issue in research on the future of the European Union. This article contributes to a rather new movement in differ­en­tiated integration research, which deals with struc­turing and categorising the differ­en­tiated integration reality of the European Union. Based on an analytical frame that concep­tu­alises differ­en­tiated integration at work as a path-dependent process with a special focus on the imple­men­tation of differ­en­tiated integration struc­tures, a clear cut and detailed picture of patterns of differ­en­ti­ation within the area of freedom, security and justice is drawn.


Coordinating Successfully in Turbulent Times – the Danish EU Presidency in the first half of 2012

Mads Dagnis Jensen and Peter Nedergaard

This article reviews the Danish Presi­dency of the Council of the EU in the first half of 2012 based on an analytical framework and distilled from coordi­nation theory. It shows how the Danish Presi­dency had to coordinate in a Post-Lisbon environment and against the backdrop of a severe economic crisis. The overall goal of the Danish Presi­dency was to adopt a number of initia­tives which would create ‘a more respon­sible, dynamic, greener and safer Europe’ in a profes­sional way. In order to realise these aims the Danish Permanent Repre­sen­tation in Brussels had wide room for manoeu­vring the negoti­a­tions, as long as they stayed within the broad framework defined in Copen­hagen. Overall, the Danish Presi­dency performed well and gained recog­nition for having profes­sionally closed several major initia­tives in a turbulent political period of the EU.


The European External Action Service and the Organisation of the European Union’s External Assistance and Development Aid: From Institutional Dissonances to Inter-service Harmony?

Isabelle Tannous

The Lisbon Treaty left the future organ­i­sation of the European Union’s external assis­tance and devel­opment aid largely unanswered. It was only after its entry into force on 1 December 2009 and with the adaptation of the European External Action Service (EEAS) that the organ­i­sa­tional setting was clarified. This contri­bution outlines the contro­versy over the decision-making cycle and the tools of the foreign and devel­opment aid, and examines the reorgan­i­sation of powers between the EEAS, the new DG DEVCO and the EU delega­tions. The focus lies on strategic planning and programming of EU’s main foreign aid instru­ments for the years 2014–2020: the European Devel­opment Fund (EDF), the Devel­opment Instrument (DCI) and the new European Neigh­bourhood Instrument (ENI). The analysis tackles the general impact of this rearrangement on the future paths of the EU’s external relations.


Subnational Administrations as Guarantors of Legitimacy of the European Union – documented by European Cohesion Policy

Volkmar Kese and Daniel Zimmermann

The lack of legit­imacy of the European Union has been discussed by both, legal and political scien­tists. In order to solve this problem, most scien­tists suggest that input-orien­tated legit­imacy should be increased by, for example, strength­ening the position of the European Parliament within the insti­tu­tional structure of the European Union. This paper, however, examines the role of subna­tional admin­is­tra­tions as guarantors of legit­imacy of European policies. Consid­ering these policies, output-orien­tated legit­imacy is measured by efficiency and effec­tiveness. To what extent the subna­tional admin­is­tra­tions are able to meet these require­ments will be documented by examining European Cohesion Policy.


LITERATUR

Marcus Hornung

Der Vertrag von Lissabon und die ‚neue‘ Europäische Union aus der rechtswis­senschaftlichen Perspektive


ARBEITSKREIS EUROPÄISCHE INTEGRATION

Frédéric Krumbein

Sport­politik in Europa: Mehr als die Debatte um Ronaldos Frisur?

Julian Plottka

Zuhören statt entscheiden: die Rolle sozialer Medien in der europa­poli­tischen Kommunikation

Sybille Röhrkasten
Inter­na­tionale Kooper­ation im Bereich erneuerbare Energien: Ein Blick auf die Schwellenländer