Sie lesen aktuell unserer Archiv. Die aktuelle Webseite befindet sich unter: iep-berlin.de
You are currently reading our archive. The current webseite is located at: iep-berlin.de/en/

IEP Lunch Debate with Thomas Westphal: “The Stabilization of the Eurozone: Current Successes, Unfinished Business”

Michael Vollprecht, Prof. Dr. Mathias Jopp and Thomas Westphal

The IEP lunch debate on the topic of “The Stabi­lization of the Eurozone: Current Successes, Unfin­ished Business” with Thomas Westphal, Director of European Policy in the Federal Ministry of Finance, took place at the Repre­sen­tation of the European Commission in Berlin on 10 December 2014. Michael Vollprecht, Economic and Financial Counsellor from the Political Division of the European Commission in Berlin, gave the opening remarks. Prof. Dr. Mathias Jopp, director of the Institut für Europäische Politik (IEP), moderated the event.

In his intro­ductory remarks, Michael Vollprecht empha­sized that the new president of the EU Commission, Jean-Claude Junker, aims to strengthen the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) during his tenure. Thomas Westphal began his presen­tation by asserting that in order to strengthen and further stabilize the Eurozone, the confi­dence that was lost during the crisis must be won back. Confi­dence was achieved during the first ten years of the EMU, which he regarded as a great success. The Euro had become the world´s second most important currency in only a short time and the European Central Bank had worked towards price stability, whereupon the interest rates on government bonds among the Eurozone countries converged. The doubts that arose during the financial crisis in markets regarding invest­ments, however, had dramatic conse­quences.  Interest rates rose once again. In Greece, Portugal, and Ireland, the increase was many times higher than it was in Germany. The crisis exposed many weaknesses in the EMU, e.g., that the compet­i­tiveness of the EU countries had developed unevenly during the previous years.  In order to win back trust, these weaknesses must be elimi­nated. Westphal agrees with the current four-pillar system of the EMU, though there are still obstacles to its imple­men­tation. The first pillar consists of reforms for more compet­i­tiveness, despite the fact that many citizens are showing signs of reform fatigue. In the short term, confi­dence can still only be rebuilt through continued reform efforts by all member states. Efforts toward rebuilding compet­i­tiveness depend on country-specific require­ments including the European Semester and growth-friendly consol­i­dation. The second pillar consists of cross-border European oversight over the financial markets and better regulation. At the level of the insti­tu­tions of the EMU, the third pillar, a revision of the EU treaties cannot be ruled out. The devel­opment of the fiscal union must be promoted and the Stability and Growth Pact must be strengthened.  The fourth pillar consists of the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) and the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), crisis mecha­nisms which according to Westphal only comprise “a firewall to keep the fire from spreading to neigh­boring houses.” They don´t, however, extin­guish the fire itself.

The initial successes of the four-pillar model can already be noted. Three aid programs have already ended (Ireland, Portugal and Spain). Westphal lamented the fact that little has been said about these successes while much attention has been given to the problems in Greece, where the second aid program is currently underway. The programs have improved compet­i­tiveness, but confi­dence is only slowly recov­ering. Interest rates on government bonds will become more consistent again. Still, there is much unfin­ished business. Growth is weak and unequally distributed within the EU member states. Investment activity is low, but debt levels are high. There is still a need for consol­i­dation and little room for public spending. The crisis posed another challenge to the Eurozone: unemployment rates have climbed dramat­i­cally. This is critical, as the Eurozone cannot afford the loss of labor force and high unemployment rates can fuel the trend of Euroskep­ticism. “The idea of ‘Europe’ is great, but is difficult to comprehend for someone who has just lost their job,” Westphal said in closing.

By Helen Müller and Anthony Baumann